Sculpting in Time with Andrei Tarkovsky (2024)

Vikram Zutshi

·

Follow

7 min read

·

Jan 12, 2019

--

Vikram Zutshi

Sculpting in Time with Andrei Tarkovsky (2)

When people encounter the cinema of Andrei Tarkovsky for the first time, it can feel akin to a religious experience. Time seems to stand still and one beholds the world as if through new eyes. “My discovery of Tarkovsky’s first film was like a miracle. Suddenly, I found myself standing at the door of a room the keys of which had until then, never been given to me. It was a room I had always wanted to enter and where he was moving freely and fully at ease“ rhapsodized Swedish auteur Ingmar Bergman. “I felt encountered and stimulated: someone was expressing what I had always wanted to say without knowing how” he said, adding that “Tarkovsky is for me the greatest, the one who invented a new language, true to the nature of film, as it captures life as a reflection, life as a dream.”

Born on April 4th, 1932 in the Yuryevetsky district of Russia, Tarkovsky made only seven films over the course of his career, cut short by terminal cancer on 29th December, 1986. Tarkovsky’s works Andrei Rublev, Solaris, Mirror, and Stalker are regularly listed among the greatest films of all time. After his death, some former KGB agents testified that the director did not die of natural causes but was poisoned to curtail what the Soviet authorities saw as production of anti-Soviet propaganda. The allegations were backed up his doctor.

Tarkovsky came of age as a filmmaker in 1950’s Russia, during a period referred to as the Khrushchev Thaw, during which Soviet society grew more accepting of foreign films, literature and music. He was able to see films of European, American and Japanese directors, an experience which influenced his own ouevre. He soaked up the films of the Italian neo-realists, French New Wave, and of directors such as Kurosawa, Buñuel, Bergman, Bresson, Andrzej Wajda and Mizoguchi.

His films are undergirded by metaphysical themes, extremely long takes, and ravishing images. Dreams, memory, childhood, running water accompanied by fire, rain indoors, reflections, levitation, and characters re-appearing in the foreground of long panning movements of the camera are recurring elements. He once said, “Juxtaposing a person with an environment that is boundless, collating him with a countless number of people passing by close to him and far away, relating a person to the whole world, that is the meaning of cinema.”

One can find several scenes of levitation in Tarkovsky’s films, most notably Solaris. He used water, clouds and reflections for their surreal beauty as well as their symbolism, such as waves or the forms of brooks or running water.

Tarkovsky called his theory of cinema “sculpting in time”, which was also the title of his book, published shortly before his death. In it he writes about art and cinema in general, and his own films in particular. In his view the unique characteristic of the medium was to subvert or redefine our experience of time. By using unedited footage and long takes, he wanted to give the viewers a sense of the passage of time and the subtle relationship of one moment to another. It was perhaps due to the influence of the Japanese masters like Ozu and Mizoguchi who could elevate the simple act of slicing a loaf of bread or riding a bicycle into something extraordinary.

All of his films contain monochrome, and in Stalker’s case sepia sequences, while otherwise being in color. In a 1966 interview, Tarkovsky declared that color film was a “commercial gimmick” and claimed that in everyday life one does not consciously notice colors most of the time, and that color should therefore be used in film mainly to emphasize certain moments, but not all the time, as this distracts the viewer.

After making a short film, The Killers, adapted from an Ernest Hemingway story, he completed his diploma film, The Steamroller and the Violin at the State Institute of Cinematography, and in 1962, Tarkovsky directed his first feature, Ivan’s Childhood, telling the story of an orphan boy and his experiences during World War Two. In a 1962 interview, Tarkovsky stated that in making the film he wanted to “convey all [his] hatred of war”, and that he chose childhood “because it is what contrasts most with war.” The film won the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival and launched him into the international spotlight.

His next film Andrei Rublev (1965), was co-written with Andrei Konchalovsky and is loosely based on the life of Andrei Rublev, the 15th-century Russian icon painter. It is divided into seven episodes, with a prologue and an epilogue only loosely related to the main film. The film is set in 15th century Russia, a tumultuous era marked by fighting between rival princes and the Tatar invasions. The film’s themes include religious and artistic freedom, rejection of political certainty, autodidacticism, and creating uncompromising art under an authoritarian regime. Not surprisingly, it was banned from releasing domestically in the Soviet Union for many years after completion. A heavily edited version of the film was screened at the 1969 Cannes Film Festival, where it won the FIPRESCI prize.

Solaris is a meditative psychological drama based on Stanislaw Lem’s 1961 novel of the same name. The film is set aboard a space station orbiting the planet Solaris. The scientific mission has stalled because the skeleton crew of three scientists have been afflicted by individual emotional crises. Psychologist Kris Kelvin travels to the Solaris space station only to encounter the same mysterious phenomena as the others. Aboard the space station, Kelvin is haunted by a mirage of his late wife and memories of his home, and the suicide of a previous scientist casts its long shadow through the empty chrome corridors. “We don’t want to conquer space at all. We want to expand Earth endlessly. We don’t want other worlds, we want a mirror.” These words, uttered by the disillusioned and paranoid Dr. Snaut, paint in one simple stroke the existential core of Solaris.

Solaris premiered at the 1972 Cannes Film Festival and won the Grand Prix Spécial du Jury.

Tarkovky’s next film Mirror unfolds as a stream-of-consciousness narrative recalled by a dying poet (based on Tarkovsky’s own father Arseny, who in reality would outlive his son by three years) highlighting important moments in both his personal life as well as the political events in twentieth century Russia. In an effort to represent these themes visually, the film combines contemporary scenes with early memories, dreams, and newsreel footage. Its visual palette moves interchangeably between color, black-and-white, and sepia.

The film was blacklisted by Soviet authorities due to it’s content and its perceived elitist nature. Only a few prints were made and the filmmakers received no returns.

The last film directed by Tarkovsky in the Soviet Union was Stalker, with a screenplay written by Boris and Arkady Strugatsky, adapted from their novel Roadside Picnic. The film combines elements of science fiction undergirded by deep philosophical and psychological themes, as in all his films.

The film depicts an expedition led by a figure known as the “Stalker” (Aleksandr Kaidanovsky) to take his two clients — a melancholic writer (Anatoli Solonitsyn) seeking inspiration, and a professor (Nikolai Grinko) seeking answers — to a mysterious restricted site known simply as the “Zone,” where there is a room which supposedly has the ability to fulfill a person’s innermost desires. The trio travel through unnerving areas filled with the debris of modern society while engaging in existential debate. The “Zone” itself appears sentient, while their path through it can be sensed but not seen. The film was completed in 1979 and won the Prize of the Ecumenical Jury at the Cannes Film Festival.

In the same year, Trakovsky began production on The First Day, set in 18th century Russia during the reign of Peter the Great. It was stopped in mid production by the Soviet film board when they got wind that it contained several scenes critical of the official atheism in the Soviet Union.

During the summer of 1979, Tarkovsky traveled to Italy, where he shot the documentary Voyage in Time together with his long-time friend Tonino Guerra. Soon after he returned to Italy to start shooting Nostalghia. He never went back to Russia.

Nostalghia was presented at the Cannes Film Festival in 1983 and won the FIPRESCI prize and the Prize of the Ecumenical Jury. Tarkovsky also shared a special prize called Grand Prix du cinéma de creation with Robert Bresson. Soviet authorities prevented the film from winning the Palme d’Or, a fact that hardened Tarkovsky’s resolve to never work in the Soviet Union again.

During 1985, he shot the film The Sacrifice in Sweden. At the end of the year he was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer. In January 1986, he began treatment in Paris and was joined there by his son, who was finally allowed to leave the Soviet Union. The Sacrifice was presented at the Cannes Film Festival and received the Grand Prix Spécial du Jury, the FIPRESCI prize and the Prize of the Ecumenical Jury. Starring Erland Josephson, it centers on a middle-aged intellectual who attempts to bargain with God to stop an impending nuclear holocaust.

The Sacrifice was lensed by Sven Nykvist, a frequent collaborator with Ingmar Bergman. It was Tarkovsky’s third film as a Soviet expatriate, after Nostalghia and the documentary Voyage in Time, and was also his last, as he died shortly after its completion.

In Tarkovsky’s last diary entry (15 December 1986), he wrote: “But now I have no strength left — that is the problem”. The diaries are sometimes also known as Martyrolog and were published posthumously in 1989 and in English in 1991.

Tarkovsky died in Paris on 29 December 1986. He was buried in the Russian Cemetery in Sainte-Geneviève-des-Bois in France. The inscription on his gravestone, which was ideated by Tarkovsky’s wife, Larisa Tarkovskaya, reads: To the man who saw the Angel.

(This article was originally published in Much Ado About Cinema)

Sculpting in Time with Andrei Tarkovsky (2024)

FAQs

What is the meaning of sculpting in time Tarkovsky? ›

Russian film director Andrei Tarkovsky saw film as 'sculpting in time', a concept which can be contemplated through philosophical and artistic notions of duration, presence and perception, of materiality and embodiment.

What is the best Andrei Tarkovsky movie to start with? ›

Conclusion. Many people ask where to start with Tarkovsky. The answer is Ivan's Childhood. It's the most translatable movie to the masses, both technically and emotionally.

Why was Andrei Tarkovsky exiled? ›

As he was bitter and disappointed with the Soviet Union's efforts to prevent his films being made and receive international recognition, as they deemed his art to possess a certain anti-Soviet sentiment, he decided at the beginning of the 1980s never to return and work in his homeland again.

What was Tarkovsky's last film? ›

His last film, The Sacrifice (1986) was shot in Sweden with many of Ingmar Bergman's regular collaborators, and won an almost unprecedented four prizes at the Cannes Film Festival. He died of lung cancer at the end of the year. Two years later link=Sergei Parajanov dedicated his film Ashik Kerib to Tarkovsky.

What is sculpting in time reflections on the cinema summary? ›

In Sculpting in Time, Tarkovsky sets down his thoughts and his memories, revealing for the first time the original inspirations for his extraordinary films—Ivan's Childhood, Andrey Rublyov, Solaris, The Mirror, Stalker, Nostalgia, and The Sacrifice.

What according to Tarkovsky is the purpose of art? ›

'The aim of art is to prepare a person for death, to plough and harrow his soul, rendering it capable of turning to good' (43). The film that best expresses Tarkovsky's philosophy of life and art is Stalker.

Did Tarkovsky like Terminator? ›

Although strongly opposed to commercial cinema, in a famous exception Tarkovsky praised the blockbuster film The Terminator (1984), saying its "vision of the future and the relation between man and its destiny is pushing the frontier of cinema as an art".

Are Tarkovsky movies hard to understand? ›

Most people assume a Tarkovsky film is too difficult to understand. In reality, there's nothing to be understood in the traditional sense. His films were essentially stream of consciousness. Tarkovsky believed art couldn't be explained from a purely intellectual perspective.

Did Bergman and Tarkovsky meet? ›

Unfortunately Tarkovsky and Bergman never met. Bergman admires Tarkovsky and vice versa, but Bergman is rather shy and doesn't want to meet new people, without being prepared.

What is the longest Tarkovsky movie? ›

Andrei Tarkovsky is arguably the patron saint of long films, and at 205 minutes, Andrei Rublev — his reflection on medieval Russia and the role of the Christian artist — is his longest film.

Is Tarkovsky still alive? ›

How old was Tarkovsky when he made his first film? ›

And Tarkovsky has had this kind of impact from the beginning. His first picture, the 1962 “Ivan's Childhood,” made when he was 30, took the Grand Prize at the Venice Film Festival and two other major international awards.

Top Articles
Danlaw Technologies India Ltd share price | About Danlaw Tech. | Key Insights
Accidental Drowning Lawyer in PA | Mattiacci Law, LLC
Poppers Goon
Panorama Charter Portal
Academic Calendar Biola
Basic Setup – OpenXR & Pimax HMDs...
Best Laundry Mat Near Me
Hailie Deegan News, Rumors, & NASCAR Updates
Sutter Health Candidate Login
Craigslist Farm And Garden Yakima Wa
Momokun Leaked Controversy - Champion Magazine - Online Magazine
For My Derelict Favorite Novel Online
Sarah Dreyer Obituary
Wow Patchu Pet Battle
Bingo Kans Berekenen
1V1.Lol Pizza Edition
Myth or Fact: Massage Parlors and How They Play a Role in Trafficking | OUR Rescue
Dirty Old Man Birthday Meme
Sites Like SkiptheGames Alternatives
60 Days From May 31
Who should be in the Country Music Hall of Fame (but isn't yet)? Our picks
Ruc Usmc List
Stellaris Wargoal
Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep & Ram Vehicles in Houston, MS | Eaton CDJR
Pole Barns 101: Everything You Need to Know - Big Buildings Direct
craigslist: northern MI jobs, apartments, for sale, services, community, and events
Lee Lucas Jaliyah Dad
Infinity Pool Showtimes Near Cinemark 14 Chico
Nyu Paralegal Program
Reptile Expo Spokane
Erome.ccom
Maine Marine Forecast Gyx
Ethos West Mifflin
16 Things to Do in Los Alamos (+ Tips For Your Visit)
Banette Gen 3 Learnset
Academy Sports Meridian Ms
Are Huntington Home Candles Toxic
Target Minute Clinic Hours
Malibu Horror Story Showtimes Near Regal Atlantic Station
House Party 2023 Showtimes Near Mjr Chesterfield
cGMP vs GMP: What's the Difference? | Ascendia Pharma
Premier Nails Lebanon Pa
Registrar Utd
NCCAC
Craigs List Outdoor Furniture
Damaged car, damaged cars for sale
How To Buy Taylor Swift Tickets By Navigating Ticketek's Stress-Inducing System
La Monja 2 Pelicula Completa Tokyvideo
Stock Hill Restaurant Week Menu
Busty Young Cheerleaders
About Data | Weather Underground
Backrooms Level 478
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated:

Views: 6272

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.