References
von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. Theory Of Games And Economic Behavior 2nd edn, xviii, 641 (Princeton Univ. Press, 1947).
Schelling, T. C. The strategy of conflict: prospectus for a reorientation of game theory. J. Confl. Resolut. 2, 203–264 (1958).
Ross, L. & Nisbett, R. E. The Person And The Situation: Perspectives Of Social Psychology (Pinter & Martin, 2011).
Meegan, D. V. Zero-sum bias: perceived competition despite unlimited resources. Front. Psychol. 1, 191 (2010). In this research, participants exhibited a persistent zero-sum bias, expecting a zero-sum resource distribution even in an explicitly non-zero-sum context.
Foster, G. M. Peasant society and the image of limited good. Am. Anthropol. 67, 293–315 (1965).
Bazerman, M. H. & Neale, M. A. Negotiating Rationally (Simon and Schuster, 1993).
Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T. & Neale, M. A. Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 35, 294–313 (1985).
Różycka-Tran, J., Boski, P. & Wojciszke, B. Belief in a zero-sum game as a social axiom: a 37-nation study. J. Cross Cultural Psychol. 46, 525–548 (2015). This article constructs and validates a measure of general zero-sum beliefs and examines their prevalence and correlates across 37 different countries.
Roczniewska, M. & Wojciszke, B. Reducing hindering job demands: the role of belief in life as a zero-sum game and workload. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 18, 10036 (2021).
Boyer, P. & Petersen, M. B. Folk-economic beliefs: an evolutionary cognitive model. Behav. Brain Sci. 41, e188 (2018). This article puts forth a theoretical framework for the evolution of zero-sum beliefs (operationalized as a specific instance of ‘folk economic beliefs’) as a cognitive heuristic.
Andrews-Fearon, P., Götz, F. M., Serapio-García, G. & Good, D. Zero-sum Mindset and its Discontents https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/zero-sum-mindset-and-its-discontents (Social Macroeconomics Working Paper, Blavatnik School Of Government, 2021).
Barnes, L. Taxing the rich: public preferences and public understanding. J. Eur. Public Policy 29, 787–804 (2022).
Rubin, P. H. Folk economics. South. Econ. J. 70, 157–171 (2003). This article examines lay conceptions about the economy and identifies domain-specific zero-sum beliefs about the economy as the basis for people’s folk economic beliefs.
Leiser, D. & Shemesh, Y. How We Misunderstand Economics And Why It Matters: The Psychology Of Bias, Distortion And Conspiracy (Routledge, 2018).
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M. & Armstrong, T. L. Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: an instrumental model of group conflict. J. Soc. Issues 54, 699–724 (1998).
Louis, W. R., Esses, V. M. & Lalonde, R. N. National identification, perceived threat, and dehumanization as antecedents of negative attitudes toward immigrants in Australia and Canada. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43, E156–E165 (2013).
Roberts, R. & Davidai, S. The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 123, 559–575 (2022). This paper examines how the experience of threat leads people to view others’ gains as coming at their expense but not vice versa.
Norton, M. I. & Sommers, S. R. Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 215–218 (2011). This research finds that white Americans believe that the drop in anti-Black prejudice over the past seven decades has been offset by a rise in anti-white prejudice.
Kuchynka, S. L., Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A. & Puryear, C. Zero-sum thinking and the masculinity contest: perceived intergroup competition and workplace gender bias. J. Soc. Issues 74, 529–550 (2018).
Ruthig, J. C., Kehn, A., Gamblin, B. W., Vanderzanden, K. & Jones, K. When women’s gains equal men’s losses: predicting a zero-sum perspective of gender status. Sex Roles 76, 17–26 (2017).
Sicard, A. & Martinot, D. School as a zero-sum game between boys and girls: gender differences in perceptions. Int. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 31, 18 (2018).
Wong, Y. J., Klann, E., Bijelić, N. & Aguayo, F. F. The link between men’s zero-sum gender beliefs and mental health: findings from Chile and Croatia. Psychol. Men. Masc. 18, 12–19 (2017).
Smithson, M., Sopeña, A. & Platow, M. J. When is group membership zero-sum? Effects of ethnicity, threat, and social identity on dual national identity. PLoS One 10, e0130539 (2015).
Wilkins, C. L. et al. Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians? Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 122, 73–101 (2021).
Bhattacharjee, A., Dana, J. & Baron, J. Anti-profit beliefs: how people neglect the societal benefits of profit. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 113, 671–696 (2017).
Davidai, S. & Ongis, M. The politics of zero-sum thinking: the relationship between political ideology and the belief that life is a zero-sum game. Sci. Adv. 5, eaay3761 (2019). This article uses correlational, experimental and archival research to examine the prevalence of domain-specific zero-sum beliefs about immigration, race and economic success among liberal and conservative Americans.
Johnson, S. G. B., Zhang, J. & Keil, F. C. Win–win denial: the psychological underpinnings of zero-sum thinking. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151, 455–474 (2022). This article presents a series of experimental studies that examine people’s zero-sum beliefs about simple economic transactions between buyers and sellers.
Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M. & Dhar, R. When going green backfires: how firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. J. Consum. Res. 41, 823–839 (2014).
Brown, N. D. & Jacoby-Senghor, D. S. Majority members misperceive even “win-win” diversity policies as unbeneficial to them. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 122, 1075–1097 (2022).
Maoz, I. & McCauley, C. Psychological correlates of support for compromise: a polling study of Jewish–Israeli attitudes toward solutions to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Polit. Psychol. 26, 791–808 (2005).
Andrews-Fearon, P. & Davidai, S. Is status a zero-sum game? Zero-sum beliefs increase people’s preference for dominance but not prestige. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 152, 389–409 (2022). This article presents a series of correlational and experimental studies that examine the causal effect of domain-specific zero-sum beliefs about status on people’s willingness to use dominance and aggression to rise in social rank.
Pilditch, T. D., Fenton, N. & Lagnado, D. The zero-sum fallacy in evidence evaluation. Psychol. Sci. 30, 250–260 (2019).
Hasson, Y., Amir, E., Sobol-Sarag, D., Tamir, M. & Halperin, E. Using performance art to promote intergroup prosociality by cultivating the belief that empathy is unlimited. Nat. Commun. 13, 7786 (2022).
Burleigh, T. J., Rubel, A. N. & Meegan, D. V. Wanting ‘the whole loaf’: zero-sum thinking about love is associated with prejudice against consensual non-monogamists. Psychol. Sex. 8, 24–40 (2017).
Cunningham, N. C., Mitchell, R. C. & Mogilski, J. K. Which styles of moral reasoning predict apprehension toward consensual non-monogamy? Pers. Individ. Differ. 196, 111732 (2022).
Chinoy, S., Nunn, N., Sequeira, S. & Stantcheva, S. Zero-sum thinking and the roots of U.S. political divides. Preprint at https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/stantcheva/files/zero_sum_us_political_divides.pdf (2023).
Marshburn, C. K., Reinkensmeyer, B. A. & Knowles, E. D. Dominance motivated delusions: whites with high social dominance orientation perceive equal amounts of institutional racism between Blacks and whites. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221103984 (2022).
Wilkins, C. L., Wellman, J. D., Babbitt, L. G., Toosi, N. R. & Schad, K. D. You can win but I can’t lose: bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discrimination. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 57, 1–14 (2015). This research finds that members of high-status groups (men and white people) express greater zero-sum beliefs when considering the threatening proposition of increasing bias against their own group.
Wright, R. Nonzero: The Logic Of Human Destiny (Vintage Books, 2000).
Ruisch, B. C., Anderson, R. A. & Pizarro, D. A. The challenge of accounting for individual differences in folk-economic beliefs. Behav. Brain Sci. 41, e186 (2018).
Tappin, B. M., Ross, R. & McKay, R. T. Do the folk actually hold folk-economic beliefs? Behav. Brain Sci. 41, e190 (2018).
Jones, J. M. US views of foreign trade nearly back to pre-Trump levels. Gallup https://news.gallup.com/poll/390614/views-foreign-trade-nearly-back-pre-trump-levels.aspx (10 March 2022).
Buss, D. M. Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychol. Inq. 6, 1–30 (1995).
Demoulin, S. & Teixeira, C. P. Social categorization in interpersonal negotiation: how social structural factors shape negotiations. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 13, 765–777 (2010).
Kakkar, H. & Sivanathan, N. The impact of leader dominance on employees’ zero-sum mindset and helping behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 107, 1706–1724 (2022).
Smithson, M. & Shou, Y. Asymmetries in responses to attitude statements: the example of “zero-sum” beliefs. Front. Psychol. 7, 984 (2016). This article demonstrates consistent framing effects in people’s responses to zero-sum propositions, based on beliefs about asymmetries in resource flows and distributions of power between parties.
Wilkins, C. L. & Kaiser, C. R. Racial progress as threat to the status hierarchy: implications for perceptions of anti-white bias. Psychol. Sci. 25, 439–446 (2014).
Wilkins, C. L., Hirsch, A. A., Kaiser, C. R. & Inkles, M. P. The threat of racial progress and the self-protective nature of perceiving anti-White bias. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 20, 801–812 (2017).
Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M. & Armstrong, T. L. The immigration dilemma: the role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. J. Soc. Issues 57, 389–412 (2001).
Craig, M. A. & Richeson, J. A. Information about the US racial demographic shift triggers concerns about anti-White discrimination among the prospective White “minority”. PLoS One 12, e0185389 (2017).
Craig, M. & Richeson, J. A. On the precipice of a “majority–minority” America: perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects White Americans’ political ideology. Psychol. Sci. 25, 1189–1197 (2014).
Stefaniak, A. & Wohl, M. J. A. In time, we will simply disappear: racial demographic shift undermines privileged group members’ support for marginalized social groups via collective angst. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 25, NP1–NP23 (2022).
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y. & Murnighan, J. K. Mind games: the mental representation of conflict. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 132–148 (2012).
ten Brinke, L., Black, P. J., Porter, S. & Carney, D. R. Psychopathic personality traits predict competitive wins and cooperative losses in negotiation. Pers. Individ. Differ. 79, 116–122 (2015).
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Mitchell, M. In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. J. Soc. Psychol. 134, 151–167 (1994).
Ho, A. K. et al. The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 109, 1003–1028 (2015).
Harinck, F., De Dreu, C. K. W. & Van Vianen, A. E. M. The impact of conflict issues on fixed-pie perceptions, problem solving, and integrative outcomes in negotiation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 81, 329–358 (2000).
Sirola, N. & Pitesa, M. Economic downturns undermine workplace helping by promoting a zero-sum construal of success. Acad. Manag. J. 60, 1339–1359 (2017). This research examines the effect of a macroeconomic factor that signals resource scarcity on zero-sum beliefs about workplace success and their downstream consequences.
Jachimowicz, J. M. et al. Inequality in researchers’ minds: four guiding questions for studying subjective perceptions of economic inequality. J. Econ. Surveys https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12507 (2022).
He, T., Derfler-Rozin, R. & Pitesa, M. Financial vulnerability and the reproduction of disadvantage in economic exchanges. J. Appl. Psychol. 105, 80–96 (2020).
Krugman, P. Lumps of labor. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/07/opinion/lumps-of-labor.html (7 October 2003).
Platow, M. J. & Hunter, J. A. in Understanding Prejudice, Racism, and Social Conflict 195–212 (Sage, 2001).
Festinger, L. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7, 117–140 (1954).
Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L. & Suls, J. A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychol. Bull. 144, 177–197 (2018).
Putnam-Farr, E. & Morewedge, C. K. Which social comparisons influence happiness with unequal pay? J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 150, 570–582 (2021).
Davidai, S. & Deri, S. The second pugilist’s plight: why people believe they are above average but are not especially happy about it. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 148, 570–587 (2019).
Deri, S., Davidai, S. & Gilovich, T. Home alone: why people believe others’ social lives are richer than their own. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 113, 858–877 (2017).
Davidai, S., Deri, S. & Gilovich, T. There must be more to life than this: the impact of highly-accessible exemplars on self-evaluation and discontent. Self Identity 20, 72–93 (2021).
Weingarten, E., Davidai, S. & Barasch, A. Who’s on first? People asymmetrically attend to higher-ranked (vs. lower-ranked) competitors. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 104, 104405 (2023).
Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M. & Bialosiewicz, S. Relative deprivation: a theoretical and meta-analytic review. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 16, 203–232 (2012).
Ongis, M. & Davidai, S. Personal relative deprivation and the belief that economic success is zero-sum. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151, 1666–1680 (2022).
Kimmel, M. Angry White Men: American Masculinity At The End Of An Era (Bold Type Books, 2013).
Lee, S. W. S. & Schwarz, N. A grounded cognition perspective on folk-economic beliefs. Behav. Brain Sci. 41, e175 (2018).
Curhan, J. R., Overbeck, J. R., Cho, Y., Zhang, T. & Yang, Y. Silence is golden: extended silence, deliberative mindset, and value creation in negotiation. J. Appl. Psychol. 107, 78–94 (2022).
Chambers, J. R. & De Dreu, C. K. W. Egocentrism drives misunderstanding in conflict and negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 51, 15–26 (2014).
Johnson, S., Zhang, J. & Keil, F. Consumers’ beliefs about the effects of trade. SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3376248 (2019).
Katz-Navon, T. Y. & Goldschmidt, C. Goal orientations in negotiations: the influence of goal orientations on fixed-pie perceptions and bargaining outcomes. Int. J. Psychol. 44, 60–70 (2009).
Caplan, B. What makes people think like economists? Evidence on economic cognition from the “Survey of Americans and Economists on the Economy”. J. Law Econ. 44, 395–426 (2001).
Blendon, R. J. et al. Bridging the gap between the public’s and economists’ views of the economy. J. Econ. Perspect. 11, 105–118 (1997).
Frederick, S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 25–42 (2005).
De Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L. & Steinel, W. Unfixing the fixed pie: a motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 975–987 (2000).
Kern, M. C., Brett, J. M., Weingart, L. R. & Eck, C. S. The “fixed” pie perception and strategy in dyadic versus multiparty negotiations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 157, 143–158 (2020).
Hirshleifer, D. Presidential address: social transmission bias in economics and finance. J. Financ. 75, 1779–1831 (2020).
Chernyak-Hai, L. & Davidai, S. “Do not teach them how to fish”: the effect of zero-sum beliefs on help giving. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 151, 2466–2480 (2022).
Różycka-Tran, J. et al. Belief in a zero-sum game and subjective well-being across 35 countries. Curr. Psychol. 40, 3575–3584 (2021).
Jiang, X., Hu, X., Liu, Z., Sun, X. & Xue, G. Greed as an adaptation to anomie: the mediating role of belief in a zero-sum game and the buffering effect of internal locus of control. Pers. Individ. Differ. 152, 109566 (2020).
Davidai, S., White, W. M. & Gregorich, V. The fear of conflict leads people to systematically avoid potentially valuable zero-sum situations. Sci. Rep. 12, 17944 (2022).
Shin, J. & Kim, J. K. How a good sleep predicts life satisfaction: the role of zero-sum beliefs about happiness. Front. Psychol. 9, 1589 (2018).
Thompson, L. L. Information exchange in negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 27, 161–179 (1991).
Dong, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, H.-J. & Jiang, J. Why is crafting the job associated with less prosocial reactions and more social undermining? The role of feelings of relative deprivation and zero-sum mindset. J. Bus. Ethics 184, 175–190 (2022).
Adamska, K., Jurek, P. & Różycka-Tran, J. The mediational role of relational psychological contract in belief in a zero-sum game and work input attitude dependency. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 46, 579–586 (2015).
Crocker, J., Canevello, A. & Lewis, K. A. Romantic relationships in the ecosystem: compassionate goals, nonzero-sum beliefs, and change in relationship quality. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 112, 58–75 (2017).
Borawski, D. The loneliness of the zero-sum game loser. the balance of social exchange and belief in a zero-sum game as predictors of loneliness. Pers. Individ. Differ. 135, 270–276 (2018).
Zhang, H. & Sun, S. Zero-sum construal of workplace success promotes initial work role behavior by activating prevention focus: evidence from Chinese college and university graduates. Front. Psychol. 11, 1191 (2020).
Obaidi, M., Kunst, J., Ozer, S. & Kimel, S. Y. The “Great Replacement” conspiracy: How the perceived ousting of Whites can evoke violent extremism and Islamophobia. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 25, 1675–1695 (2021).
Berbrier, M. The victim ideology of white supremacists and white separatists in the United States. Sociol. Focus. 33, 175–191 (2000).
Williams, T. C. The French origins of “you will not replace us”. The New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/12/04/the-french-origins-of-you-will-not-replace-us (27 November 2017).
Wilson, A. F. in Secrecy And Society (SJSU Scholarworks, 2018).
Eibach, R. P. & Keegan, T. Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and white and Black Americans’ differing assessments of racial progress. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 90, 453–467 (2006).
Kimmel, M. America’s angriest white men: up close with racism, rage and Southern supremacy. Salon https://www.salon.com/2013/11/17/americas_angriest_white_men_up_close_with_racism_rage_and_southern_supremacy/ (2013).
Schreckinger, B. White supremacist groups see Trump bump. POLITICO https://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/donald-trump-white-supremacists-216620 (2015).
Mondon, A. & Winter, A. Reactionary Democracy: How Racism And The Populist Far Right Became Mainstream (Verso Books, 2020).
McGhee, H. The Sum Of Us: What Racism Costs Everyone And How We Can Prosper Together (One World, 2021). This book uses interviews and analyses of archival data to explore how zero-sum beliefs have consistently been used to stifle economic and social progress in the USA throughout the 20th and 21st centuries.
Brown, N. D., Jacoby-Senghor, D. S. & Raymundo, I. If you rise, I fall: equality is prevented by the misperception that it harms advantaged groups. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm2385 (2022).
Rasmussen, R. et al. White (but not Black) Americans continue to see racism as a zero-sum game; white conservatives (but not moderates or liberals) see themselves as losing. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17, 1800–1810 (2022).
Krosch, A. R. & Amodio, D. M. Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9079–9084 (2014).
Stefaniak, A., Mallett, R. K. & Wohl, M. J. A. Zero-sum beliefs shape advantaged allies’ support for collective action. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 50, 1259–1275 (2020).
Wellman, J. D., Liu, X. & Wilkins, C. L. Priming status-legitimizing beliefs: examining the impact on perceived anti-white bias, zero-sum beliefs, and support for affirmative action among white people. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 55, 426–437 (2016).
King, E. B., Knight, J. L. & Hebl, M. R. The influence of economic conditions on aspects of stigmatization. J. Soc. Issues 66, 446–460 (2010).
Jackson, L. M. & Esses, V. M. Effects of perceived economic competition on people’s willingness to help empower immigrants. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 3, 419–435 (2000).
Piotrowski, J., Różycka-Tran, J., Baran, T. & Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. Zero-sum thinking as mediator of the relationship of national attitudes with (un)willingness to host refugees in own country. Int. J. Psychol. 54, 722–730 (2019).
Kehn, A. & Ruthig, J. C. Perceptions of gender discrimination across six decades: the moderating roles of gender and age. Sex. Roles 69, 289–296 (2013).
Ruthig, J. C., Kehn, A., Fisher, W. N. & Carstens Namie, E. M. Consequences of a zero-sum perspective of gender status: Predicting later discrimination against men and women in collaborative and leadership roles. Sex. Roles 85, 13–24 (2021).
Schaube, S. & Strang, L. M. (Not) everyone can be a winner: the role of payoff interdependence for redistribution. ECONtribute https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/ajkajkdps/160.htm (2022).
Różycka-Tran, J., Jurek, P., Olech, M., Piotrowski, J. & Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M. A warrior society: data from 30 countries show that belief in a zero-sum game is related to military expenditure and low civil liberties. Front. Psychol. 9, 2645 (2019).
Kelman, H. C. The political psychology of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: how can we overcome the barriers to a negotiated solution? Polit. Psychol. 8, 347–363 (1987).
Baron, J., Bazerman, M. H. & Shonk, K. Enlarging the societal pie through wise legislation: a psychological perspective. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 123–132 (2006).
Stiglitz, J. Distinguished lecture on economics in government: the private uses of public interests: incentives and institutions. J. Econ. Perspect. 12, 3–22 (1998).
Różycka-Tran, J., Alessandri, G., Jurek, P. & Olech, M. A test of construct isomorphism of the Belief in a Zero-Sum Game scale: a multilevel 43-nation study. PLoS One 13, e0203196 (2018).
Liu, W., Liu, L. A. & Zhang, J.-D. How to dissolve fixed-pie bias in negotiation? Social antecedents and the mediating effect of mental-model adjustment. J. Organ. Behav. 37, 85–107 (2016).
Sloman, S. A. & Vives, M.-L. Is political extremism supported by an illusion of understanding? Cognition 225, 105146 (2022).
Vitriol, J. A. & Marsh, J. K. The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsem*nt of conspiracy beliefs. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 48, 955–969 (2018).
Black, J. F. & Davidai, S. Do rich people “deserve” to be rich? Charitable giving, internal attributions of wealth, and judgments of economic deservingness. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 90, 104011 (2020).
Bobo, L. & Hutchings, V. L. Perceptions of racial group competition: extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61, 951 (1996).
Rohrer, J. M. & Murayama, K. These are not the effects you are looking for: causality and the within-/between-person distinction in longitudinal data analysis. SAGE J. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221140842 (2023).
